Cost-effectiveness of iptacopan for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria

Iptacopan Iptacopan: FABHALTA, a complement factor B inhibitor, is the first oral medication approved to treat adults with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). It was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in December 2023. Fabhalta is taken twice a day in a capsule form. What is FABHALTA? … , a novel oral Factor B inhibitor, recently obtained FDA approval for treating paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: (par-uk-SIZ-muhl nok-TURN-uhl hee-muh-gloe-buh-NYOOR-ee-uh) A rare and serious blood disease that causes red blood cells to break apart. Paroxysmal means sudden and irregular. Nocturnal means at night. Hemoglobinuria means hemoglobin in the urine. Hemoglobin is the red part of red blood cells. A… , a rare blood disorder characterized by persistent complement-mediated hemolytic anemia hemolytic anemia: Anemia due primarily to the excessive hemolysis or destruction of red blood cells . The standard-of-care (SOC) has traditionally relied on complement C5 inhibitors eculizumab eculizumab: Eculizumab (Soliris ®) is given as an IV into a vein at the doctor’s office or at a special center. The procedure usually takes about 35 minutes. You will probably get an IV once a week for the first 4 weeks. Starting in the 5th week, you will get a slightly higher dose of Soliris every 2 weeks. … and ravulizumab, which are limited by persistent anemia anemia: (uh-NEE-mee-uh) A condition in which there is a shortage of red blood cells in the bloodstream. This causes a low red blood cell count. Symptoms of anemia are fatigue and tiredness. from extravascular hemolysis hemolysis: (hi-MOL-uh-suss) The destruction of red blood cells. and requirement for intravenous infusion intravenous infusion: A method of getting fluids or medicines directly into the bloodstream over a period of time. Also called IV infusion. . Recent publication of phase 3 studies in this arena reinforces iptacopan as an effective anti-complement monotherapy compared with SOC. Given ongoing price negotiations and limited literature showing its cost-ineffectiveness in the anti-C5-treated population, we conducted a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis of iptacopan monotherapy in anti-C5-treated patients from the societal perspective, as compared to C5 inhibition. The primary outcomes were the incremental net monetary benefit (iNMB) across a lifetime horizon and the cost-effective maximum monthly threshold price of iptacopan monotherapy compared to the SOC. The secondary outcome was time saved for patients and nurses with the utilization of oral iptacopan therapy. Iptacopan monotherapy and SOC accrued 12.6 and 10.8 QALYs at costs of $9.52 million and $13.5 million, respectively. Iptacopan remained cost-saving across extensive sensitivity and all scenario analyses, including alternative parameterization for anemia resolution and aggregated individual-level utilities and transition probability matrix. Across all probabilistic sensitivity analyses, iptacopan therapy was favored over SOC in 100% of 10,000 Monte Carlo iterations. Cost-saving thresholds for iptacopan versus anti-C5 in are ~1.1, 1.4, and 1.4 in Brazil, Japan, and the United States. Iptacopan monotherapy can improve quality-adjusted life expectancy for patients while saving healthcare costs across jurisdictions.